
The State, Globalization, and Development: Whatever Happened to Development?
Article 9.1
WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO DEVELOPMENT?
BY JAWIED NAWABI
January/February 2018
Introduction
Since World War II, if we count the number of countries which can been be considered
to have moved from being “hird World” (or “developing”) countries to
being developed countries, how many countries make the list? By my count it would
be ive: South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Qatar. China is on its
way and certain regions of China are already it to be termed “developed.” In Africa,
out of the 54 countries, we cannot conidently tally any to have attained developed
status (South Africa is termed an “Emerging Market Economy”). Latin America
has had several more decades since independence to build an industrial base. (Most
of Latin America, not including the Caribbean, nominally gained independence
between the 1820s and 1880s, 80-150 years before most of Africa, the Caribbean
(outside of Haiti), and most of Asia.) However, the region’s industry has not reached
globally competitive levels compared to the Asian “Tigers.” Latin America and the
Caribbean’s share of world income grew from about 5.8% in 1985 to about 7.2% in
2010. Meanwhile, East Asia and Paciic’s (excluding Japan) grew from 4.1% in 1985
to 11.6% in 2010.
An increasing share of total world income has been going to the developing part
of the world. In 1995, about 17.5% of world income went to 83% of the world population
(developing countries); by 2010, the igure had increased to about 30.3% (mostly
because of East Asia). But that means that about 70% of the income still went to the..
LINK TO FULL ARTICLE: (PDF) THE STATE, GLOBALIZATION, AND DEVELOPMENT: WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO DEVELOPMENT


